Playbook, gym

An empty bike in a full class is the thing being charged for

Members find this charge genuinely confusing, because the class was included in what they already pay. The fee is not for the session. It is for a place held against a capacity other people were queuing for, and once that sentence is said plainly most of the objection goes away. What remains is an argument about the deadline, which is always counted in hours.

Why this is not the general answer

The handling pattern for deposits and no-show fees holds across every trade. What follows is the part that does not.

  • The member has already paid for the class, so the charge has to be explained as compensation for the held place rather than as a price, and a club that never says that out loud is charging for something the member believes they bought.
  • Plenty of clubs run this as strikes rather than as money: a number of missed bookings inside a rolling period suspends class booking for a while, which is a penalty that appears on no price list anywhere.
  • The deadline is the whole policy and it is counted in hours before the start, so a member dropping out at seven for an eight o'clock class is comfortably late by the rule and comfortably early by any ordinary reading of the day.
  • A place taken off the waiting list inherits the same deadline with far less time left on it, which is where the disputed charges actually come from rather than from members who simply did not turn up.

How it arrives

  • do you charge if i miss a class i booked
  • how much is the no show fee
  • i dropped out an hour before am i still charged
  • how many no shows before you stop me booking
  • i got a place off the waiting list and could not go
  • can i appeal a no show charge

What has to be indexed for this to work

Material behind this answer
The deadline, the charge and the strike rule in one placeHours before the session, the amount if there is one, and the number of misses inside what period before booking is suspended. Members meet all three at once and the material should present them the same way.
The reason the charge exists, in a sentenceThat a held place kept somebody else out of a full class. This single line does more for acceptance than the policy wording does, and almost no club publishes it.
What happens to a place released from the waiting listWhether it carries the deadline, how long the member has to decline it, and what happens when it arrives after the deadline has passed. The honest answer here is worth publishing even when it is awkward.
Who reviews a disputed charge and what they needThe named role, what they want to know, and how long a decision takes. Without this the assistant has nothing to hand to and the member goes to a review site instead.

The reply

A reply worth copying
The class is included in your membership, so the charge is not for the session: it is because a booked place kept somebody else out of a full class [1]. Dropping out is free up to the deadline, which is counted in hours before the start rather than on the day, and that catches most people out [2]. I cannot see a charge on your account or remove one. If you think one is wrong, leave me your name, the email on your account and the date, and the team will look at it.

It says what the fee is for in the opening line, because the member is arguing about being charged twice rather than about the amount. It names the counting method as the thing that catches people, which reads as candour rather than as a warning. And it offers the review route without hinting at the outcome.

Where it stops

The trigger. The visitor disputes a specific charge, says booking has been suspended, or asks for a fee to be dropped.

The handover, worded
I cannot see your account or any charge on it. Leave me your name, the email on your account and the date of the class, and the team will look at it and reply.

It stops answering before it guesses, says who will pick it up, and asks for the one thing that makes a reply possible. Nothing about it reads as a dead end.

Never say this here

Out of bounds

  • Never say a charge will be waived or refunded, since that is a decision about one member's account.
  • Never say how many strikes somebody has, because there is no view of any record here.
  • Never describe the fee as a charge for the class, as it is a charge for the place.
  • Never say a late drop out was inside the deadline, since the deadline is counted by the booking system and not from here.

Questions

Does publishing the reason for the fee reduce the complaints?
It moves them from indignation to a question about the deadline, which is answerable. A member who thinks they were charged for something they already bought does not read the rest of the policy.
Can it tell a member whether they were charged?
No. It cannot see an account, a booking or a payment. It explains the rule and takes the details so somebody who can see the record picks it up.
Should the strike rule sit on the same page as the fee?
Yes, because members experience them as one policy. A club that publishes the money and keeps the suspension in the small print gets a very angry message the first time somebody cannot book.

Keep reading

Try it on your own material

Upload a document or point it at your site, paste one line of HTML, then ask it something only your business could answer.