Playbook, online course

One person, one purchase, and a clause they have just read properly

There is no account manager here and no renewal to protect. The complainant paid once, out of their own money, on the strength of a sales page, and the two things they hold are a card dispute and a review. They will usually mention both, and they are usually arguing about a clause rather than about a failure.

Why this is not the general answer

The handling pattern for complaints holds across every trade. What follows is the part that does not.

  • The customer is an individual who spent their own money on a hope, so the complaint reads as disappointment rather than as procurement, and a correctly worded refusal with a citation attached is exactly the wrong reply to it.
  • Most of these are arguments about a clause and not about something breaking: the refund window, how much of the course was watched, what lifetime access covers, whether a module that has gone was ever promised.
  • Withdrawing or rebuilding a module is the complaint peculiar to this trade, because access was sold as permanent and the buyer reasonably understood that to include the thing they bought it for.
  • Where the complaint is that an instructor never answered, the thing being complained about is what justified the higher price of the cohort, which makes it a commercial problem rather than a support one.

How it arrives

  • this is not what the sales page promised
  • a module i paid for has been taken down
  • nobody has answered my question in the forum for weeks
  • i want to speak to whoever runs this course
  • i will dispute this with my bank if you ignore me
  • you closed the refund window while i was waiting for a reply

What has to be indexed for this to work

Material behind this answer
Who a complaint reaches, and how quicklyA named route with a response period, and it must not be the same contact form the person has already used. A complaint answered by the mechanism that ignored them is what turns a private message into a public one.
Your published position on changing or withdrawing materialWhat you may change, what notice is given, and what a learner with lifetime access is entitled to when a module goes. Write it before you need it, because writing it during a complaint reads as inventing it.
The refund window and how it is counted, quoted exactlyThe number of days, what it runs from, and whether watching part of the course affects it. Quote it rather than paraphrase, because a paraphrase becomes the term you are then held to by somebody who is already annoyed.
What a cohort promises about instructor responseWhere questions go, who answers, and within what period. If nothing is published, every complaint about silence is unanswerable, and this is the complaint most likely to be repeated in a review that other buyers read.

The reply

A reply worth copying
I am sorry this has gone this way, and I would rather it reached somebody than stopped with me. Complaints go to the route on our contact page, which says who picks them up and how long they take, and it is a different address from the general one [1]. Where the question is about a module that has changed, our terms set out what we may change and what access covers, and I would rather a person went through that with you than have me quote it at you [2]. I cannot see your purchase, decide a refund or agree what should happen. Leave your name, the email you bought with and the dates involved, and it goes across today.

It apologises for the experience and concedes nothing about fault, which is the distinction that keeps the message safe without sounding like a form letter. It names the terms without quoting them, because quoting a clause back at somebody complaining about that clause is the most inflammatory thing available. And it says today, which is the part the person is actually testing.

Where it stops

The trigger. Every complaint, and immediately on any mention of a card dispute, a review, legal advice or a refund window that has closed.

The handover, worded
This needs a person, and it needs one today rather than a policy page. Leave your name, the email you bought with and the dates, and it goes to the complaints route on our contact page with everything you have written attached.

It stops answering before it guesses, says who will pick it up, and asks for the one thing that makes a reply possible. Nothing about it reads as a dead end.

Never say this here

Out of bounds

  • Never agree that a course was mis sold, that a module should not have been withdrawn, or that anybody was let down.
  • Never refuse a refund, or say a window has closed for a particular purchase, since nothing here can see when anybody bought.
  • Never offer a refund, a discount, an extension or free access to calm somebody down.
  • Never name an instructor, a moderator or anybody else as the reason something went wrong.

Questions

Should it answer the complaint or route it?
Route it, recognise it and collect the details, and nothing else. A cited paragraph from the terms in reply to somebody saying the course was not what was promised proves that no person read the message, which is the actual grievance underneath most of these.
Somebody threatens a card dispute. Does that change anything?
It changes the speed. That message should reach a person the same day with the purchase email attached, because a dispute is decided on evidence and a timeline, and both are easier to assemble before it is filed than after.
Is a form the right destination for a complaint about a course?
It is what you have, and it works if it lands somewhere different from the general enquiries address and somebody owns it. What does not work is routing a complaint back through the channel the person is complaining about being ignored on.

Keep reading

Try it on your own material

Upload a document or point it at your site, paste one line of HTML, then ask it something only your business could answer.