Playbook, veterinary clinic

Routing a veterinary complaint without saying anything about the treatment

Complaints at a practice divide by what sits underneath them. A complaint about the desk, a wait or a bill is administrative. A complaint following an animal deteriorating or dying is about clinical care, and it arrives carrying grief, which is what makes a sympathetic sentence in the wrong place genuinely dangerous.

Why this is not the general answer

The handling pattern for complaints holds across every trade. What follows is the part that does not.

  • The patient cannot give an account of what happened, so the entire factual record is the clinical notes and the owner's memory, and any sentence composed here that appears to describe events becomes a third version nobody can stand behind.
  • A large share of these arrive after a death, which means the message is grief before it is a complaint, and a reply opening with a procedure reads as a practice defending itself before it has said it is sorry.
  • Veterinary surgeons are registered and answerable to a regulator, so the practice's own written procedure is a document the client is entitled to see rather than an internal courtesy nobody was meant to read.
  • Money and care tangle together here in a way they do not elsewhere: an owner who declined an option on cost may complain about the outcome, and separating the fee question from the clinical one is the first thing the practice must do and the last thing an assistant should attempt.

How it arrives

  • i want to complain about how my dog was treated
  • nobody rang me when my cat was in overnight
  • who do i complain to about a vet
  • can i have a copy of your complaints procedure
  • the bill was nothing like the estimate i was given
  • the nurse was rude to me when i collected him

What has to be indexed for this to work

Material behind this answer
Your complaints procedure as a document with names in itWho receives a complaint, who investigates it, how long each step takes and who signs the reply. Publish the version you would hand across the desk, because an owner who can see the steps usually gives them a chance to run.
Where a complaint can go above the practiceThe regulator or scheme a client may approach once your own process is finished, stated without discouragement. Owners find this anyway, and a practice that names it looks like one expecting to be judged fairly.
What you need in order to look into itThe animal's name, the dates, which vet, and what the owner would like to happen. The last of those is the most useful question in the list and the one almost nobody thinks to ask.
Who reviews anything clinicalThe named vet or partner who looks at care rather than at admin. Naming the role is what makes the handover read as an escalation rather than as a brush off.

The reply

A reply worth copying
I am very sorry, and I want this to reach the right person rather than stop with me. We have a written complaints procedure setting out who looks into it and how long each stage takes, and you can ask for a copy [1]. Anything about your animal's care is reviewed by one of the vets rather than by reception [2]. Please leave me your name, an email, your animal's name and the dates, and it goes to the practice manager today.

The apology is for the experience and says nothing at all about the treatment, which is the line that protects the practice without sounding cold. Naming the procedure as something the client can hold makes it a process rather than a wall. Asking for the animal's name matters more than it looks: it is how the practice finds the record, and it acknowledges the animal rather than the case number.

Where it stops

The trigger. Every complaint, and immediately on any mention of a solicitor, the regulator, an indemnity provider, a post mortem or a review.

The handover, worded
This needs a person at the practice rather than me. Leave your name, an email, your animal's name and what happened, and the practice manager will pick it up and tell you what happens next.

It stops answering before it guesses, says who will pick it up, and asks for the one thing that makes a reply possible. Nothing about it reads as a dead end.

Never say this here

Out of bounds

  • Never say whether treatment was appropriate, whether anything was missed, or whether a different decision would have changed the outcome.
  • Never say the animal could not have been saved, or that nothing more could have been done, because that is a clinical opinion and it is the sentence owners remember word for word.
  • Never attribute what happened to a named vet, nurse or student.
  • Never say a bill will be reduced or waived, since that is a judgement about one case and it can be read afterwards as an admission.

Questions

Should it try to settle small complaints?
No. It should recognise them and route them, and do nothing else. A cited quotation from the price list in reply to a message about an animal that died is the most damaging thing this could produce, because it proves nobody read it.
Is naming the regulator risky?
You are generally expected to tell clients about that route anyway. An owner who can see there is somewhere above the practice usually gives the practice a fair run before going there.
What if the complaint is really about the bill?
Then it is administrative and the same procedure applies, and the reply needs to contain no sentence about the treatment at all. For a fee dispute none is needed, which is what makes that version safe to route quickly.

Keep reading

Try it on your own material

Upload a document or point it at your site, paste one line of HTML, then ask it something only your business could answer.