Source material
Warranty documents, and the three things customers think are one thing
A warranty question is nearly always a question about which of three overlapping things applies, asked by somebody who does not know there are three. Your document usually describes one of them. Every passage taken out of it will be offered to all three questions, and the document has no way to say which one it is talking about unless you make it say so.
Why this one is harder than it looks
The three are a manufacturer's warranty, an extended warranty or service plan somebody bought separately, and, in many markets, statutory rights that apply to faulty goods regardless of any warranty at all. They have different durations, different triggers, different claim routes, and completely different answers to the question is this covered. A customer types one sentence that could be about any of them.
Most warranty documents cover exactly one of the three and never name the other two. That is fine for a document a person reads on a product page with the context in front of them. It is not fine for a passage, which arrives with no context and asserts a duration and a coverage as though they were the only ones.
Then there are the conditions that void it, which are usually at the bottom of the document under a heading nobody would search for. Accidental damage, unauthorised repair, commercial use of a domestic product, removal of a serial label, failure to follow the instructions. A passage about coverage retrieved without any of these promises coverage, and the voiding conditions are precisely the part of a warranty that decides most real claims.
Finally, the phrase parts and labour does an enormous amount of unspoken exclusion. It usually does not include shipping the item to you, a call-out to somebody's home, consumables, wear parts, or the time somebody spent without the product. None of that is stated, because the phrase is a term of art among people who sell warranties and an ordinary English phrase to everybody else. A passage containing it will be read as covering more than you meant.
What it has to contain
Structure rather than wording. A passage pulled out of this document has to stand on its own, because that is the only form in which it will ever be read.
| A named section per warranty, using the customer's name for it | The warranty that comes with the product, the plan somebody may have bought, and a short section acknowledging that in many markets a faulty product carries rights that exist separately from both. Each with its own heading, so a passage from one carries the name of which one it is. |
|---|---|
| Duration written with its start event in the same sentence | Not the length alone but the length and what starts it: the date of purchase, the date of delivery, the date of installation, or the date of a registration if you require one. These are different dates and the difference decides claims. |
| A voiding section headed by what it does | Called something like what is not covered and what ends the warranty, in words a customer would use, listing each condition as its own line. Not a paragraph of exclusions welded together, because a single line is a cleaner unit for a passage than a clause inside a wall of text. |
| Two lists where the phrase parts and labour currently sits | What is covered, item by item, and what is not, item by item. Shipping, call-out, consumables, wear parts, data, and time without the product either appear on one of those lists or they are ambiguous, and ambiguity in a warranty document always resolves in the direction of the customer's expectation. |
| The claim route with what to have ready | Where a claim goes, what proof of purchase you accept, whether registration is required and what happens if somebody did not do it. A warranty section that describes coverage without the route generates a second conversation for every claim. |
The rewrite, in order
Name the three things separately before you touch anything else
Add three headings at the top of the document, even if two of them are only a paragraph long. The manufacturer warranty. The extended plan, if you sell one. And a short honest paragraph saying that in many markets a product that is faulty, not as described, or not fit for purpose carries rights that sit alongside any warranty rather than being replaced by it, with your own published wording where you have it.
This one change fixes most of the category, because it gives every subsequent passage a heading that identifies which of the three it belongs to. Without it there is no signal anywhere in the document, and no amount of careful sentence writing further down will supply one.
Where you trade, the detail of those statutory rights differs, so keep that paragraph short and taken from your own advisers rather than expansive and borrowed. A short accurate paragraph is worth more here than a long confident one.
Attach the start event to every duration
Search for every period in the document and write the trigger into the same sentence. From the date of purchase is not the same as from the date of delivery, and for anything installed it is often neither. If different products have different triggers, they need different sections rather than one section with a note.
While you are there, deal with registration. If registering the product extends or activates anything, that is a condition and it belongs in the duration sentence, not in a marketing box on a different page. A customer whose warranty depended on a registration they never did should be able to find that out from the same passage that told them the length.
Turn parts and labour into two explicit lists
Write what is covered as a list of things: the component, the work to fit it, the diagnostic, whatever is genuinely included. Then write what is not, as a second list, and put the awkward items on it by name. Postage to you. A visit to somebody's home. Batteries, filters, belts, blades, anything you class as a consumable. Damage from misuse.
The reason to make these lists rather than a paragraph is retrieval as much as clarity. A list item is short, self-contained and matches directly against the question somebody types, which is usually about one specific item and not about the category it belongs to. Somebody asks whether the postage is covered, not whether ancillary costs are included.
Move the voiding conditions up and write them in customer words
Take the exclusions out of the bottom of the document and put them immediately after the coverage they limit. This is the same move as pulling an exception up against its rule in a returns policy, and it matters more here, because a warranty exclusion is usually the deciding fact in a real claim rather than an edge case.
Then translate them. Unauthorised third party intervention becomes somebody else opened it or repaired it. Use inconsistent with the intended purpose becomes using a home product in a business. The legal phrasing can stay in the document if your advisers want it there, but the customer's phrasing has to be in the same block, because the customer's phrasing is what gets matched.
What happens if you skip it
A coverage promise from a document whose conditions were never retrieved
Somebody describes a product that stopped working and asks whether it is under warranty. The passage that matches best is the coverage paragraph, because that is the paragraph about things being covered. It says the product is covered for the published period, cites itself, and stops. The clause about a repair by somebody else, or about commercial use, or about the registration that was never completed, was in a different part of the document and was not among the passages retrieved.
The cost is a claim that arrives already believing it will be honoured, and a person who has to be the one to say no while looking at a screenshot of your own assistant saying yes. Moving the conditions next to the coverage removes the failure at the source, because then the two travel together in the same passage.
Check it against this
Before you index it
- The manufacturer warranty, any extended plan and statutory rights each have their own heading
- Every duration names the event it starts from
- Registration requirements sit in the same sentence as the duration they affect
- Parts and labour has been replaced by an inclusion list and an exclusion list
- Voiding conditions sit next to the coverage they limit, not at the bottom
- Exclusions are written in the words a customer would use for them
- The claim route and the proof you accept are in the document
Questions
- The manufacturer publishes the warranty, not us. What do we index?
- Index your own summary of it, clearly labelled as a summary, with a link to theirs and the date you checked it. What you should not do is upload a copy of a manufacturer document that you cannot keep current, because a stale warranty length is a specific and expensive kind of wrong answer.
- Should the assistant ever say something is covered?
- It can state what the published terms cover, cited. It cannot decide one claim, because it has no visibility of the purchase, the condition, or what happened to the product. The way to keep that line clean is in the document: terms written as conditions rather than as reassurance are much harder to read as an approval.
- Our warranty terms are a page in a product manual. Is that enough?
- A manual is read page by page as text, so the words are available, but a warranty buried on page forty of a manual competes badly against every other page of that manual. Publish the terms separately as well, under their own headings, and let the manual be the manual.
Keep reading
- The question this document answersWhat the visitor is really asking, and where an answer becomes a handover.
- How to write a returns policy an AI assistant can answer fromWhy a passage about the return window answers confidently without the exclusions, and how to restructure the document so it cannot.
- Writing a cancellation policy an assistant can quote accuratelyNotice periods are relative to something the passage does not carry. How to write a cancellation policy that survives being read in pieces.
- How to write a booking policy an assistant can answer guests fromMost booking policies are written for staff. Here is how to restructure one so the answers a guest actually needs are present in the text.
- Every kind of source materialWhat to feed an assistant, and the surgery each document needs first.
Try it on your own material
Upload a document or point it at your site, paste one line of HTML, then ask it something only your business could answer.