Playbook, car dealership
Bought online or bought here, and why that decides everything
There is no exchange in this trade in the sense every other retailer means it, because each car is a single item and the one somebody wants instead has a different price, a different history and a different owner count. What there is instead is a narrow set of circumstances in which a sale can be undone, and the fact that decides which set applies is one the customer never thinks to mention.
Why this is not the general answer
The handling pattern for returns and exchanges holds across every trade. What follows is the part that does not.
- Exchange does not exist here as a counter transaction. Swapping one car for another is a fresh sale with a fresh invoice, a different price and a different part exchange position, so the word means something quite different from what the customer has in mind.
- Whether the sale happened at a distance is the pivot the whole answer turns on, and it is invisible in the question. A car bought, paid for and delivered without the buyer attending the site is in a different position from the identical car driven off the forecourt.
- A fault and a change of mind are separate requests with separate answers, and customers routinely present the second as the first because they have worked out which one carries more weight.
- The part exchange makes this harder than an ordinary return. The customer's old car has usually been prepared and often sold on by the time the request arrives, so putting the sale back is not a matter of swapping keys.
How it arrives
- can i bring the car back i dont like it
- i bought it online do i have 14 days
- theres a fault can i just return it
- can i swap it for a different car
- how long do i have to change my mind
- i part exchanged my old car can i get it back
What has to be indexed for this to work
| Your returns position written for the two cases separately | A sale made at a distance and a sale made on the forecourt, each with what applies, any period that runs, and the condition the car has to be in to come back including any mileage limit. Two blocks, because one paragraph covering both will be read as applying to whichever case the reader is in. |
|---|---|
| What a reported fault actually starts | That the first step is an inspection rather than a decision, and what the outcomes are after it: repair, replacement, or unwinding the sale. Setting out the sequence stops a customer reading a request for the car to be looked at as a refusal. |
| How a part exchanged vehicle is treated if a sale is undone | The honest position, including that the old car may already have been sold, and what happens to its value in that case. This is the part nobody publishes and the part that turns a return into an argument. |
| What happens to a credit agreement when a car goes back | Who the customer contacts, in what order, and what the dealership can and cannot do about the agreement. Described as a process only, with nothing said about what anybody is entitled to. |
The reply
It depends on how the car was bought. A sale made at a distance, where you never came to us before it was delivered, sits under different rules from one where you saw the car and drove it away, and our returns page sets out both cases with any period and any mileage limit that applies [1]. If there is a fault, the first step is an inspection rather than a decision, and the routes after that are on the same page [2]. I cannot tell which of those applies to you or say what the outcome would be. Send me your name, an email and the registration and the team will go through it.
It puts the distance question first, because it is the fact the customer omitted and every other sentence depends on it. Describing the fault route as starting with an inspection sets an expectation that somebody will look at the car, which is both true and the thing that keeps the conversation civil.
Where it stops
The trigger. Any request to return, reject or swap a vehicle, any report of a fault on a car already sold, and any question about a part exchanged car coming back.
Whether a car can go back depends on how it was bought and what is actually wrong with it, and neither is something I can establish. Leave me your name, an email and the registration and somebody will call you about it.
It stops answering before it guesses, says who will pick it up, and asks for the one thing that makes a reply possible. Nothing about it reads as a dead end.
Never say this here
Out of bounds
- Never tell a customer they have a right to return a car, or that they do not, since that turns on how the sale was made and on facts about the vehicle that it cannot see.
- Never apply a period from the distance selling case to a forecourt sale or the other way round, because it has no way to know which one happened.
- Never promise that a part exchanged car can be returned, as it has very often been prepared and sold on already.
- Never characterise a reported fault as minor, normal wear or covered, which is a judgement that belongs to whoever inspects the car.
Questions
- Can it work out whether one of our sales was a distance sale?
- No, and that is the whole difficulty. It has no record of who came to the site, so it cannot pick between the two cases. All it can do is explain that both exist and that the answer depends on which, then hand over to somebody with the file.
- Should the change of mind position be published even where the answer is no?
- Especially then. A buyer who reads before purchase that a forecourt sale carries no change of mind period makes a more careful decision, and a buyer who first learns it a week after collection makes a complaint.
- Is publishing the part exchange position not asking for trouble?
- The trouble arrives regardless, at a worse moment. Somebody expecting their old car back and being told it went to auction is a much harder conversation than one who read a plain sentence about it before they signed.
Keep reading
- Everything for a car dealershipStock moves daily and finance adverts are regulated, so this is mostly about what a dealership assistant must never claim to know.
- Handling returns and exchanges in generalWindow, condition, who pays postage, exclusions. Faulty and unwanted are two different processes with two different sets of rights.
- Money down on one specific car, and what it actually buysA reservation fee takes one registration off sale for a few days. Whether it comes back is on the form and is not settled in a chat window.
- Getting into the showroom, and getting into the carTwo unrelated questions share one word here: getting into the building, and whether a car can be adapted for the person who will drive it.
- Money back is easy to say and complicated to routeWhere a lender paid for the car, the customer is not who the money returns to, and that single fact reorders the entire conversation.
Try it on your own material
Upload a document or point it at your site, paste one line of HTML, then ask it something only your business could answer.