Playbook, private school

The question that needs a bursar rather than a fee schedule

A parent with two children, one starting in the junior school and one arriving further up, wanting a coach seat and one of them boarding in the week, is asking for a document that does not exist until somebody in the bursary makes it. Every input to it is either published, or means tested, or a matter of availability.

Why this is not the general answer

The handling pattern for quotes and estimates holds across every trade. What follows is the part that does not.

  • The figure moves with things the family has already mentioned and the assistant has no way of holding together: two year groups, a boarding pattern, a coach stop, an instrument, a sibling position.
  • A bursary is means tested against evidence the family supplies, so the number that decides affordability is the one nobody can predict, and it is assessed on a timetable of its own rather than alongside the entrance assessment.
  • A sibling position changes the arithmetic where a school operates one, but it is conditional, and applying it to an estimate for a family that turns out not to qualify hands them a figure they have already planned around.
  • Anything totalled in a chat window would read as an offer made by the school, which is a far worse outcome than a parent waiting a day for a real one.

How it arrives

  • can you work out what it would cost for two children
  • roughly how much would we pay a year with the coach
  • would we get a bursary on our income
  • is there a reduction for a third child
  • what is the difference in cost between day and weekly boarding
  • can someone send us a breakdown

What has to be indexed for this to work

Material behind this answer
Every priced line, published separatelyTuition by year group, boarding by pattern, the coach by route, lunches, instrumental lessons, wraparound sessions. Quotable one at a time, which is what makes an honest partial answer possible instead of a total.
The bursary policy, with its process and its datesThat it is means tested, what evidence is required, who assesses it, when applications close, and that it runs separately from the entrance assessment. Families conflate the two constantly and lose a deadline doing it.
The sibling position, with its conditionsWhether one exists, which children it applies to, and what has to be true for it. Keep the conditions in the same document, so no answer can quote the benefit without them.
Who produces an individual fee statementThe role, what they need from a family, and how long it takes. This is the destination for every one of these conversations and it should be named inside the answer.

The reply

A reply worth copying
I can quote any of the published lines: tuition for a given year group, the boarding rates, the coach by route, lunches and instrumental lessons [1]. What I cannot do is put them together into a figure for your family, because that turns on year groups, what you take up, and anything you apply for, and a bursary is means tested against evidence rather than estimated [2]. The bursary office produces an individual statement, and the page says what they need from you [3]. Give me your name, an email and the year groups you are thinking about, and I will pass it on.

It offers what it genuinely can do first, so the refusal reads as a boundary rather than as a shrug. Naming the means testing explains why an estimate is impossible rather than merely unavailable. And asking for the year groups in the handover means the bursary office can start work from the first reply.

Where it stops

The trigger. Any request for a total, a breakdown or an estimate for a named family, and any question about whether an award would be made at a stated income.

The handover, worded
I cannot build a figure for your family or say what an award would be, because that is assessed rather than calculated. Leave me your name, an email and the year groups involved, and the bursary office will send you a proper statement.

It stops answering before it guesses, says who will pick it up, and asks for the one thing that makes a reply possible. Nothing about it reads as a dead end.

Never say this here

Out of bounds

  • Never produce a total for a family, since it would read as a figure the school has quoted and it will be relied on.
  • Never say an award would or would not be made at any income, because the assessment weighs more than income and is made by somebody else.
  • Never apply a sibling position to an estimate, as the conditions decide whether it applies and they are not visible from here.
  • Never describe a bursary as a discount or tie it to the entrance assessment, which are two different processes on two timetables.

Questions

Could it add the published numbers together if we told it to?
It could, and it should not. Arithmetic done in the school's voice becomes a quotation a family plans around, and the first line of it is usually wrong because a boarding pattern or an application is not settled yet.
Parents ask about bursaries before applying. What should it say?
The policy, the evidence required and the closing date, and nothing about their circumstances. Most families are working out whether it is worth applying, and the process described honestly answers that better than any hint.
Does this not just push work back to the bursary?
It pushes the right work there. What it removes is the volume asking what boarding costs or whether the coach is charged separately, which is published, and what arrives has the year groups already stated.

Keep reading

Try it on your own material

Upload a document or point it at your site, paste one line of HTML, then ask it something only your business could answer.